Paradise Lost
John Milton
Published 1667
⭐⭐⭐⭐
For the first quarter of the poem I felt lost. While the language was not difficult, I was not always sure what was happening. Only when I got to the narrative of Creation, the story started to make sense. The good news is that when I arrived at Book IX, everything changed! I truly started to enjoy Paradise Lost. Yay!
Paradise Lost is an "exploration of the moral problems of God's justice," and was considered to be controversial in its time. The poem covers the temptation and fall of Adam and Eve and their removal from Paradise. It tells of Satan's rebellion against God, his expulsion from heaven, his trickery with Adam and Eve, and his banishment to hell. It also includes God's promise to redeem all mankind.
Milton took liberty to include conversations and accounts of God, Satan, Adam, Eve, and angels that we have no way of knowing are true or accurate; hence the reader has to use his imagination. With that, I think the poem is creative and fruitful. Obviously, I wouldn't read it for its biblical theology, but instead for its literary genius.
It helps to have biblical knowledge of Creation, the Book of Genesis, and the Gospel among other biblical topics. Also, my edition was somewhat modernized. Each book (or chapter) offered a truncated argument before presenting the poem, which was also helpful in understanding what to expect.
Instead of rehashing this complex poem, I just want to share two observations I had. First, what caused me to have a change of heart three-fourths of the way through the poem: Milton's description of Eve, or women in general, I believe, is hysterical. Either Milton was sarcastic, or maybe he truly represented women of his time.
Observation #1 The Presentation of Women
In Book IX, Satan devised a way to gain access into Paradise disguised as mist, and entered the serpent. Meanwhile, Adam and Eve were discussing the day's work when Eve proposed that they divide the work and go about separately expediting their tasks; but Adam, who believed that solitude was good sometimes and encouraged return again, opposed Eve's idea and reminded her of the angel's warning of the Enemy, in case he find her alone. He argued that his wife would be safest by his side. Yet, Eve disliked to be considered unable to be careful enough and insisted on separating, anxious to exhibit her remarkable abilities. And Adam yielded.
Oh, Adam.
Poor Adam tried to make a good, strong case for himself, for husband's in general, but Eve confidently rebuked him. She trusted herself more. And off she went and was caught by Satan's lies anyway.
My first thought was that nothing has changed, at least according to the presentation Milton gave. We know that the biblical story of Adam blaming God for giving him the woman, and Eve blaming the serpent for deceiving her, that this is very relatable. But for Milton to define Eve as seeking separation from her husband (in part due to his smothering ways) and a desire to prove herself apart from him, makes me think that woman has not changed, at least, since Milton's time. And that makes a lot of sense to me.
Observation #2 Incorporating History
My second observation was that, in addition to the biblical story, Paradise Lost is full of references to Classical mythology, Greek and Roman terminology and science, and mixed with literary, religious, and English history. The more foreknowledge that the reader has of these topics, the deeper comprehension and appreciation he may have of the poem. That's why it makes me cringe when I hear snobs like Yuval Noah Hirari shun the knowledge of the past as irrelevant. Yuck!
- Yuval Noah Harari, Global Elitist
The history of the world's peoples who came before us, their religious histories, their literary stories, their myths, contribute to our world and who we are today. To dismiss it as irrelevant, to make it all about us and what evil purposes and gain "we" can use the past for today, is arrogant, shallow, and unintelligent. If Yuval has his way, no one will read Paradise Lost because it will be unreadable and unnecessary. I'm afraid we are already there, with a complete disconnect and disinterest in the past. History is becoming...history. Yet, I believe, to incorporate a variety of histories with Classical mythology into a complex biblical epic poem is an ambitious feat. Even with my delayed appreciation of the work, I recognized that this was a great piece of literature, and I am glad I finished it.
* * *
Next on TWEM poetry list: Songs of Innocence and Experience [Blake]
Hi Ruth,
ReplyDeleteI will be reading this soon as my youngest reads it this year. So far we've read together this year 'The Call of the wild, Johnny Tremain, and Red Badge of Courage. Next week is The Scarlett Letter, but I'm excited to read Paradise Lost as I've never read it! - BTW, I deleted my blog...I just don't have the inclination for it. Have a great weekend!
I know, I saw that. But totally understand.
DeleteBut WOW you will read PL with your kid? Even as a 17-yo, I wouldn't have been able to grasp this. Though I suppose it will help w/ a parent reading along side. I wish you both success.
I tried reading Call of the Wild by myself, but I got lost. However, my kids and read JT (they loved it), and Red Bad of Courage (both loved and struggled with the graphics). My youngest daughter DOES NOT like anything graphic, esp having to do with war. So that was difficult. I'm offering my kids The Scarlet Letter this year (too) as one of their literature picks. I loved it as a kid, but then hated it as an adult. But it's still great literature. Lot's of topics to explore, including how Hawthorne HATED his puritan heritage...like he tried to scrub his history clean of it by writing this. LOL. So funny. (and that's just my observation)
Your comments about Paradise Lost are resonating and captivating I read it with an Isaac Asimov guide, many years back, that covered the copious obscure references, but also bogged down my pace of reading. Not that I would have sped through such a work, by any means. Audible now has a free copy so maybe I will give it a deserved re-reading (listening). I also appreciated your piece on Oswald Chambers. I first heard of him through Dr. Charles Stanley, who gave Chambers the highest of praises. Dr.Stanley was pastor of 1st Baptist in Atlanta for many years and is highly visible on YouTube. I very much appreciated your treatment of Oswald Chambers. A quote of his that I partially remember is that our purpose is to be as broken-up bread and poured-out wine in the service of others.
ReplyDeleteThanks, George! I've yet to read an Asimov, but I bet his guide was quite interesting. I think PL is the kind of poem that needs several reads to get a complete comprehension of it. Speaking of Stanley, I have several of his biblical study guides. I like his simple approach to topics. As for the Chambers quote, I really like that one a lot.
DeleteI didn't know the Asimov thing existed! No copies of it on Amazon or ebay, alas..
DeleteI'm sorry to have been misleading about the Asimov guide. It was not a guide that came in the form of a separate volume like his guides to Shakespeare, the Bible or the Human Body. It was an annotated guide with footnotes that accompanied the PL text throughout the body of this epic poem.
DeleteI think that is how I understood it.
DeleteI was replying to what I thought another reader (Stephen) may have meant. I'm very glad to know that you are familiar with Charles Stanley (a spiritual giant) and that you liked the Chambers quote.
DeleteOK, no prob.
DeleteI did a detailed Paradise Lost read on my blog. Let me see if I can find the link: https://classicalcarousel.com/paradise-lost-by-john-milton/ That's the main review and there are links to the books within it. It also helped to read C.S. Lewis' book, A Preface to Paradise Lost which contain his lecture notes on it. Here's my review of it: https://classicalcarousel.com/a-preface-to-paradise-lost-by-c-s-lewis/
ReplyDeleteAnd as a final note. Oswald Chambers is a man to be admired and Harari is a psychotic nut-case.
Hey, Cleo! Thanks for sending the link. A while back I had seen your GoodReads review and wanted to read your blog post. Also, I think it would be a great help to read Lewis's notes on it. I definitely want to know what someone with a biblical background thinks about PP.
DeleteI am also glad you know Harari. (I'm sorry any of us has to know him, but it is necessary. He is definitely a severe mental case.)
OK, I will check out your post right now.
Hirari is an arrogant boob. I read his "Sapiens" and was MOST underwhelmed. I chuckled a bit to see your copy of the book -- it's the same edition I found in a thrift store last year for my current CC run!
ReplyDeleteI replied over at your blog under Sapiens.
DeleteThanks for letting me know! Wordpress flagged it as spam.
Delete